Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Jan 2002 06:52:56 +1100
From:      Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au>
To:        Harlan Stenn <Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com>
Cc:        Gregory Bond <gnb@itga.com.au>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: NTP packet routing problem
Message-ID:  <20020118065256.U72285@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <13699.1011247617@brown.pfcs.com>; from Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com on Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 01:06:57AM -0500
References:  <"20020117164811.T72285"@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> <13699.1011247617@brown.pfcs.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 2002-Jan-17 01:06:57 -0500, Harlan Stenn <Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com> wrote:
>It might also be the NTP associations - ntpd makes it associations based on
>the IP of the local machine, and if your PPP link goes down/up and you get a
>new IP then ntpd will continue to attempt to communicate using its old
>IP address (association).

I'm using static IP addresses so that's not it.

>OBTW, if you are using PPP connections for NTP it's probably a good idea to
>use both the "burst" and "tinker huffpuff 7200" (more or less) things in
>your ntp.conf file.

Thanks for that.  I've enabled "burst", but I missed the "huffpuff".

Peter

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020118065256.U72285>