Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:39:02 +1000 (EST) From: jason andrade <jason@rtfmconsult.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= <jonny@jonny.eng.br> Cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: broken packages directory/link for amd64 freebsd 5.1 release ? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.50.0401221235400.4689-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com> In-Reply-To: <400F3562.7040904@jonny.eng.br> References: <Pine.GSO.4.50.0401221141180.4689-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com> <400F3562.7040904@jonny.eng.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Jo=E3o Carlos Mendes Lu=EDs wrote: > 5.1? IIRC, 5.1 did not have a amd64 port... it's there on ftp-master.us drwxrwxr-x 1024 2003/12/27 09:15:48 amd64/5.1-RELEASE > And my copy of amd64 5.2-RELEASE seens to be correct. I've rsynced from > ftp-master.us correct in what way ? if i understood Kris correctly, no -RELEASE for any other architecture should have a ports/ directory - they should all be symlinks back to the i386/-RELEASE/ports/ directory as the contents are identical. it is weird that each one has a different filesize though if they are meant to be identical. -bash-2.05b$ ls -la ../../../amd64/5.2-RELEASE/ports/ -rw-rw-r-- 1 mirror mirror 24398333 Jan 11 13:16 ports.tgz -bash-2.05b$ ls -la ../../../i386/5.2-RELEASE/ports/ -rw-r--r-- 1 mirror mirror 24403986 Jan 11 14:32 ports.tgz -bash-2.05b$ ls -la ../../../sparc64/5.2-RELEASE/ports/ -rw-r--r-- 1 mirror mirror 24408312 Jan 11 16:40 ports.tgz regards, -jason
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.50.0401221235400.4689-100000>