Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 11:11:00 -0700 From: Arun Sharma <arun@sharmas.dhs.org> To: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, hardware@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New hw.cpuhz sysctl as per PR i386/27627 Message-ID: <20010706111100.A10405@sharmas.dhs.org> In-Reply-To: <20010706123840.A598@ringworld.oblivion.bg>; from roam@orbitel.bg on Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 12:38:40PM %2B0300 References: <20010706123840.A598@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 12:38:40PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Hi, > > Attached is a slight modification of the patch in PR i386/27627. > Are there any downsides to implementing this? If not, how should > it be extended to allow probing non-TSC/non-i386 timecounters? > Does this sysctl adjust itself on machines with Intel SpeedStep technology ? Based on my web searches, the MSRs which contain that info don't seem to be documented. I've read about efforts to reverse engineer the windows utility PRCPU.EXE, but haven't seen any results. It'd be great if this sysctl is adjusted. -Arun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010706111100.A10405>