Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 06:08:51 -1000 From: Robert Marella <rmarella@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Poutupgrade unsafe Message-ID: <20060918060851.279349a5@asusamd> In-Reply-To: <8b4c81f0609152151y5c6a1851n5d53514c670be54f@mail.gmail.com> References: <200609150147.k8F1l73F029577@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <450A0E7F.5090400@voidcaptain.com> <20060915164046.GN11663@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <8b4c81f0609152151y5c6a1851n5d53514c670be54f@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 01:51:06 -0300 Henry Lenzi <henry.lenzi@gmail.com> wrote: > > A nice portupgrade feature would be to grok UPDATING, and present > > you with any such notes before the upgrade occurs. > > > > Mike > > I fully agree. It's not the best solution to have an UPDATE file that > is very large and that is not integrated in the updating process. > UPDATE should be machine-readable, for starters. > > Henry I do not see a problem. A script updates my port tree every night and the last line of the script is: head -n 50 /usr/ports/UPDATING When I read my mail in the morning with my first cup of coffee...well, I read my mail. Robert
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060918060851.279349a5>