Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 14:07:58 -0500 From: Benjamin Kaduk <bjk@freebsd.org> To: Eric McCorkle <eric@metricspace.net> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, "freebsd-security@freebsd.org security" <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>, Ben Laurie <ben@links.org>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Crypto overhaul Message-ID: <20171029190758.GE26855@kduck.kaduk.org> In-Reply-To: <df46aaa5-13a9-2fc6-bcd2-d57d792800eb@metricspace.net> References: <dc08792a-3215-611c-eb9f-4936a0d621f9@metricspace.net> <CAG5KPzws=jmF2wLeEAz8Lzn7Ugude=0w5neoQjeDjYnGtJpS9Q@mail.gmail.com> <13959.1509132270@critter.freebsd.dk> <CAG5KPzxGtAwV-svCv24FbZtLvxKCwX7OSyb2pPaTc63EUmFFGA@mail.gmail.com> <20171028022557.GE96685@kduck.kaduk.org> <23376.1509177812@critter.freebsd.dk> <20171028123132.GF96685@kduck.kaduk.org> <24228.1509196559@critter.freebsd.dk> <df46aaa5-13a9-2fc6-bcd2-d57d792800eb@metricspace.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 08:36:01PM -0400, Eric McCorkle wrote: > On 10/28/2017 09:15, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > -------- > > In message <20171028123132.GF96685@kduck.kaduk.org>, Benjamin Kaduk writes: > > > >> I would say that the 1.1.x series is less bad, especially on the last count, > >> but don't know how much you've looked at the differences in the new branch. > > > > While "less bad" is certainly a laudable goal for OpenSSL, I hope > > FreeBSD has higher ambitions. > > > > I'm curious about your thoughts on LibreSSL as a possible option. I haven't been following LibreSSL enough to have an informed opinion, but my uninformed opinion was that OpenSSL proper has been proceeding with modernization at a faster pace than LibreSSL. -Ben
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171029190758.GE26855>