Date: Sun, 30 Apr 1995 02:16:41 -0700 From: Gary Palmer (FreeBSD/ARM Team) <gpalmer@freefall.cdrom.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: davidg@Root.COM, current@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: if_fddisubr.c Message-ID: <13770.799233401@freefall.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 30 Apr 95 18:23:49 %2B1000." <199504300823.SAA19250@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199504300823.SAA19250@godzilla.zeta.org.au>, Bruce Evans writes: >It compiles now. Pardon? ../../netiso/tp_pcb.c: In function `tp_init': ../../netiso/tp_pcb.c:388: structure has no member named `inp_next' ../../netiso/tp_pcb.c:388: structure has no member named `inp_prev' ../../netiso/tp_pcb.c: In function `tp_soisdisconnecting': This is on my box, with a -current source tree (and compiler and binaries) >The idea of always building NET* is to stop changes to other parts of >the system breaking it more than it already is. Yes, but is it worth it with bits like NETISO which no-one seems to use? Gary
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13770.799233401>