Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:50:05 +0100 From: Massimo Lusetti <massimo@cedoc.mo.it> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: Michael Vince <mv@roq.com>, net@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: em interrupt storm Message-ID: <1132829405.4307.5.camel@massimo.datacode.it> In-Reply-To: <438546F8.5010601@samsco.org> References: <20051123030304.GA84202@xor.obsecurity.org> <XFMail.20051122205449.jdp@polstra.com> <20051123084653.GA90927@xor.obsecurity.org> <43851A08.5080802@roq.com> <43851B69.5090701@samsco.org> <43853FF3.2050103@roq.com> <438546F8.5010601@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 21:52 -0700, Scott Long wrote: [..] > and if we don't EOI then we can't get any other interrupts. This scheme > works fairly well for typical PC hardware, and these Intel chipsets seem > to be the exception, albeit a popular one. One solution that is being [..] Yep, the wide spread of this kind of hardware makes this a big issue, isn't it? Regards -- Massimo.run();
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1132829405.4307.5.camel>