Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 14:31:02 -0500 From: "Andrew L. Gould" <algould@datawok.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: libintl.so.5 not found and general ports question Message-ID: <200404051431.02337.algould@datawok.com> In-Reply-To: <200404051223.06090.kstewart@owt.com> References: <xzpu102pdc1.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040405191308.GB1800@cs025_2k> <200404051223.06090.kstewart@owt.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 05 April 2004 02:23 pm, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Monday 05 April 2004 12:13 pm, Joshua Lokken wrote: > > * Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> [2004-04-05 12:06]: > > > On Monday 05 April 2004 11:51 am, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > > > > What would happen if a link called /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.5 > > > > was created to point to the existing libintl.so.* file on Gerry's > > > > system? > > > > > > The library interface was changed and cross linking is a really bad > > > idea. > > > > I was able to work around the problem temporarily (on 4-stable) with > > the above method (symlink), but Kent is probably right that it's not > > an ideal solution. > > It is worse than that. It is how off by one or many security problems > crop up. You call a library function and it doesn't return what you > think it was returning. > > Find out what is wrong and fix the problem. > > Kent Thank you for the warning and example. Andrew Gould
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404051431.02337.algould>