Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 01:13:29 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: weak implementation of threads has problems - kse fix attached Message-ID: <1086671609.18374.18.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10406080028070.11500-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10406080028070.11500-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-4faQEVN185PHyZKJ00vz Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 00:32, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Sean McNeil wrote: >=20 > >=20 > > Up front, I'd like to make a few apologies: > >=20 > > 1) I am sorry for the length of this email. > > 2) Although some very valid opinions have been expressed, I respectfull= y > > have to disagree. This email will hopefully strengthen my position. >=20 > Please stop spamming multiple lists. >=20 > No, I don't want to litter all our thread libraries with strong reference= s. > As I've said before, build your shared libraries correctly so they don't > bring in the threads library. In order to do this, I'm a strong proponent of making -pthread the default PTHREAD_LIBS from 4.X and 5.X. This will do the right thing in all cases, and reduces diffs among branches. What is keeping this from happening from a threading standpoint? Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-4faQEVN185PHyZKJ00vz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAxUr5b2iPiv4Uz4cRAm8EAKCNndWyv3S5K6+bTsCc+F6MkQIyJgCgksgJ 4S+uSdmI4eKIGyXUUEbBDcs= =1kPV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-4faQEVN185PHyZKJ00vz--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1086671609.18374.18.camel>