Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 09:19:31 +0100 From: "Gianmarco Giovannelli" <gmarco@scotty.masternet.it> To: NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa <y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PAO Integration? Message-ID: <199812160811.JAA09348@scotty.masternet.it> In-Reply-To: <199812160250.LAA03052@chandra.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp> References: Your message of "Tue, 15 Dec 1998 04:31:37 PST." <199812151231.EAA05213@dingo.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Mike, new-bus is good; but "newconfig" is also good, I > think. Until now, same purpose drivers stand side by side in > FreeBSD. (example, Voxware and Luigi's new audio driver, BSD ATM > and HARP, ...) > > "new-bus" and "newconfig", I think same relation. Choose by users. > Hello, I am not a programmer but I'd like to express my humble opinion. I think in this way we have a dispersion of resources. Surely we can have both, but perhaps in the double time we can have one, which works, if both party cooperate to a single project. Voxware and Luigi's drivers aren't in this situation, as I know, the first is not developed anymore. Thanks for attention. Best Regards, Gianmarco Giovannelli (http://www.giovannelli.it/~gmarco) "Unix expert since yesterday" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812160811.JAA09348>