Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Oct 1996 12:08:56 -0700 (MST)
From:      Don Yuniskis <dgy@rtd.com>
To:        gjennejohn@frt.dec.com
Cc:        donny@ms1.hinet.net, questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Where to get into the Packages installation?
Message-ID:  <199610181908.MAA09458@seagull.rtd.com>
In-Reply-To: <9610181116.AA18697@cssmuc.frt.dec.com> from "garyj@frt.dec.com" at Oct 18, 96 01:16:34 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems that garyj@frt.dec.com said:
> donny@ms1.hinet.net writes:
> 
> >   BTW, when I had a look at /stand, I found most of excatables
> >   there have the same length, around 900k.  I guess it because
> >   of the filesystem limitation, but does it waste disk space?
> 
> they're all static links to the same executable, so only inodes get used.
> Once you have FBSD up and running you can just toss /stand, you shouldn't
> need it any longer.

Ouch!  I don't know if I'd recommend *that*!  If you trash your
shared libraries (which I seem to have heard people complain of in the
past on the lists), /stand can make things quite a bit easier to get
going again -- *especially* if you trash /usr (which *holds* the shared
libraries!).  I think it's far easier to rebuild the filesystem and
restore a backup (what's that you say?  *no* backup available?? :>)
using /stand than having to resort to a boot/fixit floppy...

--don



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610181908.MAA09458>