Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:07:33 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: "Jukka A. Ukkonen" <jau789@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: A little confusing inconsistency Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomE%2BXzDggK2xVG3JBJdPiEqZNDGykwdj0_eogUKxOUncQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <56EEA5EC.9080704@gmail.com> References: <56EEA5EC.9080704@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It's just some inconsistency in how it's done. -a On 20 March 2016 at 06:30, Jukka A. Ukkonen <jau789@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello all, > > Why does sysctl report hw.platform on arm and hw.model on amd64? > The content is apparently intended to be analogous. > > E.g. on RPI2 ... > hw.platform: bcm2836 > > and then on amd64 ... > hw.model: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 4162 EE > > Is this just a little lapsus or intentional for some reason? > I noticed this when I tried bsdstats on RPI2. It complained > about missing OID hw.model. > > --jau > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomE%2BXzDggK2xVG3JBJdPiEqZNDGykwdj0_eogUKxOUncQ>