Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:54:53 +0300
From:      Panagiotis Astithas <past@ebs.gr>
To:        Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com>
Cc:        Mark Hobden <markhobden@gmail.com>, freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Patches to update jdk15 to patchset 2
Message-ID:  <4327C93D.9070702@ebs.gr>
In-Reply-To: <20050913215539.GA82424@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
References:  <20050909165832.GA16137@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <c57a763005091013427bac4533@mail.gmail.com> <20050910214746.GA6047@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <43235672.8000603@gmail.com> <43238875.8010801@ebs.gr> <20050913190428.GB80609@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <43273ED6.402@ebs.gr> <20050913215539.GA82424@misty.eyesbeyond.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Lewis wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:04:22AM +0300, Panagiotis Astithas wrote:
> 
>>Greg Lewis wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:29:25AM +0300, Panagiotis Astithas wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Pawel Worach wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Greg Lewis wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>No, I think you've done everything correctly.  I think that what is
>>>>>>happening is that back when I did the plugin support Firefox installed
>>>>>>the nspr files, but now it doesn't (as of late August).  I will need
>>>>>>to do some additional changes to support nspr being separate.  Yuk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Yea, I noticed this too, had to add /usr/local/include/nspr to the 
>>>>>include path.
>>>>
>>>>I just used the following patch:
>>>
>>>[snip]
>>>
>>>Thanks!  I've used the core idea of your patch but expanded it somewhat
>>>to try and protect other *BSD and users of older versions of Firefox.
>>>
>>>I'll attach the complete new set of patches to this e-mail.  If you
>>>see any problems please let me know, but I think this is now ready to
>>>be committed.
>>
>>Great, thanks. As another data point, the shared class data archive 
>>works fine for me here on RELENG_6/i386. You might consider enabling it 
>>in this particular configuration.
> 
> 
> Thanks.  I think because the build process currently takes so long that
> I'd prefer to commit the patch as is rather than update it and then run
> the test builds again.  Then after I've done it I will send you a patch
> to test to enable class data sharing for 6.0.  Would that work for you?


Absolutely.

Thanks,

Panagiotis




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4327C93D.9070702>