Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:21:23 +0100 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> To: Jiawei Ye <leafy7382@gmail.com> Cc: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler? Message-ID: <20090109092123.GA78163@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <c21e92e20901090045v271c33e1t39d8f69b849c3324@mail.gmail.com> References: <49668763.8020705@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20090108233311.GA69883@keltia.freenix.fr> <20090109083404.GB55615@freebsd.org> <c21e92e20901090045v271c33e1t39d8f69b849c3324@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 04:45:00PM +0800, Jiawei Ye wrote: > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> wrote: > > I am working a little on clang/llvm and I also looked at pcc, it's not > > there yet to be able to compile world/kernel but it's progressing well... > > > > > > there are two major features missing from clang (designated initializers > > and wchars) that prevents it from compiling world/kernel, and of course > > bugs :) but I am periodically checking how it performs and I post thebugs > > to the llvm/clang team... > > > > I believe we'll have it one day :) > > > > roman > What about llvm-gcc4? This has more compatibility with gcc than clang. it sure does.... now, but I think it's and dead end (for a number of reasons) I like clang better (and hence I work on that)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090109092123.GA78163>