Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 10:55:28 -0700 From: Claus Assmann <freebsd+arch@esmtp.org> To: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Mail subsystem defaults, adding authentication. Message-ID: <20020713105528.A24650@zardoc.esmtp.org> In-Reply-To: <20020713132616.GB58979@ussenterprise.ufp.org>; from bicknell@ufp.org on Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 09:26:16AM -0400 References: <20020713034725.GB47677@ussenterprise.ufp.org> <3D2FAFB2.E2E9CF36@mindspring.com> <20020713045704.GA49379@ussenterprise.ufp.org> <3D300FD4.7479A8E5@mindspring.com> <20020713132616.GB58979@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> I was more thinking SMTPS; that is the SMTPS server would allow
> SMTP AUTH, and the SMTP (25) server would not. I understand you
> can't configure sendmail to do this today. That could be
> patched though, and an interim hack would to just run two copies
> of sendmail with slightly different configs. No?
AuthOptions
...
Example:
O AuthOptions=p,y
would disallow ANONYMOUS as AUTH mechanism
and would allow PLAIN only if a security
layer (e.g., provided by STARTTLS) is
already active. ....
PS: you may want to check out _FFR_SMTP_SSL
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020713105528.A24650>