Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 23:39:59 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Hidetoshi Shimokawa <simokawa@freebsd.org>, Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> Subject: Re: firewire problem (root node is not cycle master capable) Message-ID: <200708182340.00680.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <626eb4530708091703j18bd2cd7w99f9b96a3f3c402c@mail.gmail.com> References: <200708100010.46487.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> <200708100052.39861.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> <626eb4530708091703j18bd2cd7w99f9b96a3f3c402c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Hidetoshi Shimokawa wrote: > On 8/10/07, Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> wrote: > > Am Freitag, 10. August 2007 00:23:41 schrieb Hidetoshi Shimokawa: > > > Basically, you don't need the cycle master for sbp devices. > > > Try the following. > > > > > > 1. fwcontrol -r > > > 2. fwcontrol -f 0 -r > > > > Hm, I think that's a typo, the man page doesn't show "-f" nor does > > my fwcontrol understand it. > > Oops, it was an uncommited option in my repository which sends > force_root packets. Any chance you can post a diff? I see this on a remote machine and would like to try it. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200708182340.00680.doconnor>