Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 21:23:59 +0300 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Emeric POUPON <emeric.poupon@stormshield.eu> Cc: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Fabien Thomas <fabient@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r280759 - head/sys/netinet Message-ID: <20150330182359.GR64665@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <964618150.26750606.1427732445799.JavaMail.zimbra@stormshield.eu> References: <20150329210757.GA64665@FreeBSD.org> <551943B4.90102@selasky.org> <20150330125115.GI64665@FreeBSD.org> <551948A4.1070408@selasky.org> <5519535C.40608@selasky.org> <20150330141616.GC74532@zxy.spb.ru> <1872802434.26738716.1427729028579.JavaMail.zimbra@stormshield.eu> <20150330152707.GP64665@FreeBSD.org> <964618150.26750606.1427732445799.JavaMail.zimbra@stormshield.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 06:20:45PM +0200, Emeric POUPON wrote: E> Yes, sure! E> E> I will test it tomorrow and tell you the results. E> However, keep in mind I did not see any performance impact with the previous patch. This is expectable, since a) foo++ is almost as bad to cache as atomic_add(&foo) b) you run IPSEC :) -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150330182359.GR64665>