Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 14:05:16 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ACE wrappers Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001204140139.18008A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012050018310.64731-100000@iclub.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Max Khon wrote: > hi, there! > > Is there anyone using ACE wrappers? > We are using -stable and before 4.2-RELEASE everything was fine > (on systems running 4.2-BETA before libc_r fixes/improvements) > On -stable systems cvsupped yesterday a lot of ACE tests fail > with signal 11 (we are using ACE wrappers 5.1.9). Is there anyone > experiencing the same problems? I used some relatively recent version of ACE to test these thread changes under -current. All the ACE tests, with the exception of those testing process mutexes (ACE uses SYSV semaphores for these), pass. -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.1001204140139.18008A-100000>