Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 12:30:34 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> Cc: Simon 'corecode' Schubert <corecode@corecode.ath.cx>, "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>, rbeyer@rossbeyer.net, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: package tools into ports/ (was: Re: Bzipped?) Message-ID: <20020902193033.GD55707@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20020902085654.GH2072@procyon.firepipe.net> References: <20020901142653.A32415@capable.rogards.com> <20020901191937.GI87971@leviathan.inethouston.net> <20020902103215.36ae8e3b.corecode@corecode.ath.cx> <20020902085654.GH2072@procyon.firepipe.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--jL2BoiuKMElzg3CS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:56:54AM -0700, Will Andrews wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:32:15AM +0200, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: > > actually this would be a much smaller mess if we had the package tools > > (with source) in the ports tree. best with auto-update... > > do we want to do this? > > (x-posting to arch@) >=20 > Yes we do. I plan to do this within the next week or so. Wait a minute..the package tools are used by other things than the ports collection. I don't think they should be moved out of the source tree. What problem are you really trying to solve here? Kris --jL2BoiuKMElzg3CS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9c7xYWry0BWjoQKURAm8KAKD7hGB1uvXfPiAh/x1TKR9Y5TrMZQCgkqKs w/9aCWwcHwLiaIDsoGxK8tI= =rxwh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jL2BoiuKMElzg3CS-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020902193033.GD55707>