Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 07:54:57 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: duration of the ports freeze Message-ID: <20071201205457.GA42811@k7.mavetju> In-Reply-To: <20071201203805.GQ50167@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <33640.194.74.82.3.1196149681.squirrel@galain.elvandar.org> <47518E1C.6090703@gmail.com> <20071201105443.K15697@cauchy.math.missouri.edu> <200712010933.30833.david@vizion2000.net> <20071201203805.GQ50167@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 07:38:05AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > It's not clear to me how this differs from having a branched ports > tree. Say X.org 7.4 is released tomorrow with a new set of libraries. You just won erwin@s ""Haven't they mentioned branching yet?" award. The race for the more generic but not less wanted "But what is portmgr going to do about it?" trophee is still open. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071201205457.GA42811>