Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 17:19:40 +0000 From: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> To: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> Cc: phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp), dfr@nlsystems.com (Doug Rabson), sos@FreeBSD.org (Sren Schmidt), cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata ata-all.c Message-ID: <200002271719.RAA06818@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: Message from Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> of "Sun, 27 Feb 2000 18:03:01 %2B0100." <200002271703.SAA43424@freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It seems Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > >> > > sos 2000/02/27 04:41:08 PST
> > >> > > =
> > >> > > Modified files:
> > >> > > sys/dev/ata ata-all.c =
> > >> > > Log:
> > >> > > Fix the problem that caused the boot to fail when modules we=
re loaded.
> > >> > > =
> > >> > > Real braino, confuses two different softc types, I wonder ho=
w this
> > >> > > could ever work :(
> > =
> > I had a problem yesterday trying to boot an ISA only system. I had
> > no ata configured and got a panic very early in the kernel, is that
> > related to this problem ?
> =
> No, if no ata, no wrong dev_class/softc's....
I think Poul-Henning means ata was config'd but didn't show up in the =
ls at the ``what should I boot off'' prompt.
I've had to say ``device ata0 at isa? ...'' to get around this in the =
past - ie, the line in GENERIC worked, the line in LINT didn't.
> -S=F8ren
-- =
Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org> <brian@[uk.]FreeBSD.org=
>
<http://www.Awfulhak.org>; <brian@[uk.]OpenBSD.org=
>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200002271719.RAA06818>