Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 06:22:39 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r322444 - head/Tools/scripts Message-ID: <20130709062239.GA76101@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgmnuUxAoXGk4Qs48trbsQh8w76aaAL71VokurgL_f0CZA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201307071532.r67FWZTH036372@svn.freebsd.org> <51D98A76.7090505@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxg=UWEC%2Bsn6SU4-7nipODxK83LQteQi-3F6a9dr-DM3yeA@mail.gmail.com> <51DB0777.8080300@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgkE4bJ%2Bz3miKkDUrJqCgtetgJFX=qHv4M6=M7D9mKbuXQ@mail.gmail.com> <08cbb4c709544cad3671c093558910bb@mail.adamw.org> <51DB2DB9.1070104@FreeBSD.org> <20130709011838.GA7501@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgmnuUxAoXGk4Qs48trbsQh8w76aaAL71VokurgL_f0CZA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 08:06:36AM +0200, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote: > > So is d4p port itself. Why not just bundle it there? Mk/ is not really > > for helper shell scripts, even critical ones. > > Why not? 1) Because Mk/ is for make(1) code, while this is a shell script? 2) It looks more like some part of d4p, rather than some part of b.p.m. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130709062239.GA76101>