Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 08:03:18 -0500 (EST) From: Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> To: taavi@uninet.ee (Taavi Talvik) Cc: marcel@scc.nl, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposal: Removing doscmd from the source tree... Message-ID: <200001051303.IAA07866@blackhelicopters.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.1000105144426.19323A-100000@ns.uninet.ee> from Taavi Talvik at "Jan 5, 2000 2:45:24 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > A possibility could be: 1. build it for i386 only, 2. build it via > > > buildworld without X11, regardless if X11 exists. If I want to use it > > > with X11, it is interactive and I can make it for X11 by hand - it will > > > not break on compile runs at some hour at night. > > > > I'll commit a fix that will prevent including X when DESTDIR has been > > set. In practice this means that doscmd will never include X, unless you > > compile it by hand. This of course implies that you have to compile > > doscmd by hand every time you do an installworld, given that you want X. > > Maybe knob in /etc/make.conf instead to force compiling with X? > > best regards, > taavi Actually, several ports give you the option of building with or without X support (i.e., SSH). It would be nice to have a USE_X11 option in /etc/make.conf for doscmd as well as these ports, so you don't have to specify it on the command line while building. Of course, I'd like a pony too. And a pink bike shed. ==ml To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001051303.IAA07866>