Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:32:29 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: William Gordon Rutherdale <will.rutherdale@utoronto.ca>, Gary Kline <kline@thought.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why?? (prog question) Message-ID: <87vdppv67m.fsf@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <20090331135916.fc88fa3b.freebsd@edvax.de> (Polytropon's message of "Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:59:16 %2B0200") References: <20090331025726.GA10888@thought.org> <20090331112122.ae329221.freebsd@edvax.de> <49D202F0.9010104@utoronto.ca> <20090331135916.fc88fa3b.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:59:16 +0200, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote: > When I would compare both indentation forms, I'd say that tabbing > is the better form because > + you can set your individually preferred tab with using the > settings of your editor, be it 1, 4 or 8, I like using TAB for indentation too, but when I see people setting TAB to a different size than 8 it makes me want to swear. There is a TAB size and an 'indentation level' size. These should be kept separate, and any modern editor will do it just fine! It is a bit amusing that nobody has answered the original question so far though }:-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87vdppv67m.fsf>