Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 09 Nov 1998 18:09:54 -0500
From:      Stephen Derdau <sderdau@ne.mediaone.net>
To:        pat.groce@state.sd.us
Cc:        patseal@hyperhost.net, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: unix is a problem: free bsd doesn't help
Message-ID:  <36477642.D3BF0786@ne.mediaone.net>
References:  <5D2C95997022D21187350008C7F4CF793E6C08@ESPR1SRV5.state.sd.us>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yeah then again maybe it's the server it's hosted on.
	If it's bandwidth then get more !

	Is the server NT  using frontpage 
	Maybe 250 mgs of ram isn't enough for the nt server 
	:-)
	I know I've seen freebsd and apache webservers
	handle alot of traffic .
	I think probably more than SD's site probably gets.
	Then it may have something to do with web page design.
4 t1's all those people really going to that page ?
Or are they all surfing when they shoudl be working :-)

I find it hard to believe If my site was that slow
I'd get more bandwidth !* ! * ! * ! 


pat.groce@state.sd.us wrote:
> 
> Its a bandwidth problem with our 4 t1's be over loaded. My godness but
> suddenly i can't do anything right.
> 
> Here, let me fall on the floor, now just kick me. Boy would i hate to be
> your dog!
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen A. Derdau [mailto:sderdau@ne.mediaone.net]
> Sent: Monday, November 09, 1998 12:44 PM
> To: Patrick Seal
> Cc: pat.groce@state.sd.us; FBSDQ
> Subject: Re: unix is a problem: free bsd doesn't help
> 
> One thing I just noticed.  Patseal's page comes up fast
> I went to www.state.sd.us and it takes forever just to load.
> I have a cable access modem also..
> Maybe Patrick may want to give a few pointers on how to design
> a functional website to www.state.sd.us.
> ;-)
> 
> Patrick Seal wrote:
> >
> > I'm only 15 years old and have 3 FreeBSD systems up and running on a
> > small lan. I've had no problem not solved by the list.  If you would
> > actually *READ* all the information out their,(including the readme
> > that COMES with 3.0) it would tell you not to use any NON STABLE
> > version for production systems.  My Windows systems crash multiple
> > times a day and bite more that you do.
> >
> > Have a nice M$ day :)
> >
> > Patrick Seal
> > patseal@hyperhost.net
> >
> > Hyperhost
> > Web Hosting and Design
> > http://www.hyperhost.net
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of
> > > pat.groce@state.sd.us
> > > Sent: Monday, November 09, 1998 12:30 PM
> > > To: jlemon@americantv.com; pat.groce@state.sd.us
> > > Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> > > Subject: RE: unix is a problem: free bsd doesn't help
> > >
> > >
> > > I couldn't get anything but 3.0 over the net. I mean i
> > > download boot.flp and
> > > fdimage.exe, made my install disk, and 3.0 was what i got.
> > > DON'T BLAME ME, I
> > > DID EVERYTHING THE WWW.FREEBD.ORG TOLD ME TO FOR AN
> > > INSTALL. Why didn't the
> > > web site or setup program warn me not to install 3.0?
> > >
> > > The web page at
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/install.html made it all
> > > sound so simple. I didn't know there were hidden issues!
> > >
> > > If the system isn't configured correctly its FREEBSD'S
> > > fault! Why can't a
> > > fresh install even stand on two legs? So what if its out of
> > > disk space? Not
> > > my fault. It should have configured the partitions
> > > correctly from the first
> > > place. What a joke! And you're blaming ME for the system
> > > having problems?
> > >
> > > ADMIT IT! FREEBSD CAN NEVER HOLD A CANDLE TO NT. ONLY A
> > > MOUNTAIN TROLL WHO
> > > SPENDS HIS DAYS SLOBBERING OVER A KEYBOARD HACKING SYSTEM
> > > CODE COULD EVER
> > > GET IT WORKING.
> > >
> > > This os is not for the business world!
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jonathan Lemon [mailto:jlemon@americantv.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, November 09, 1998 10:27 AM
> > > To: pat.groce@state.sd.us
> > > Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> > > Subject: Re: unix is a problem: free bsd doesn't help
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 11, 1998 at 10:01:11AM -0600, pat.groce@state.sd.us wrote:
> > > > We had been running freebsd for 4 years to handle our
> > > internet email. Last
> > > > week the hard drive crashed on the system. I had a tape backup of
> > > important
> > > > files so i reinstalled using the new freebsd 3.0 version.
> > >
> > > Let me get this straight; You had a system crash, so instead of
> > > re-installing a known good system, you upgrade a production system
> > > to the bleeding edge (3.0) without any prior testing?
> > >
> > > Honestly, this was a mistake, and the version that should have
> > > been installed was installed was 2.2.7.
> > >
> > >
> > > > cryptic errors. Sendmail keeps giving me an error:
> > > > sendmail[131]: NOQUEUE: low on space (have 0, SMTP-DAEMON
> > > needs 101 in
> > > > /var/spool/mqueue)
> > >
> > > So, sendmail gives you an error message saying that it is out of
> > > disk space, and you blame it on sendmail?  No offense, but it
> > > sounds to me like the system isn't configured correctly.
> > >
> > >
> > > > To hell with FreeBSD. We are replacing all of the systems
> > > with NT versions
> > > > of sendmail. And it works great! I neat little GUI makes
> > > sendmail and the
> > > > Exchange listservs easy to manage.The software may cost
> > > more, but in terms
> > > > of staff time, we're saving thousands, not to mention all
> > > the frustration.
> > > >
> > > > I read all the news on how unix is going to give
> > > microsoft a run for the
> > > > operating system market. I don't believe it for a second.
> > >
> > > You are welcome to your opinion.  If NT works better for you,
> > > then by all means, use it.
> > >
> > > FreeBSD is powerful, and can do anything that you want it to do.
> > > However, it setting it up and maintaining it does require more
> > > knowledge on the administrator's part than NT.  In return, it
> > > can provide "years of trouble-free operation"(tm).
> > >
> > > You did note that FreeBSD handled your email for 4 years before a
> > > harddrive crash.  Please feel free to give us a summary in 4 years
> > > from now of how well NT behaves in doing the same task.
> > > --
> > > Jonathan
> > >
> > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> > >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> 
> --
> When you find out the answer it's always something
> you thought you knew :-)
> 
> Answers here http://www.freeBSD.org/search
> 
> Happily Running!
> FreeBSD 2.2.7-STABLE #0:
> Fri Oct  9 19:54:29 EDT 1998
> sderdau@SDERDAU.ne.mediaone.net

-- 
Thank You

/SD
FreeBSD 2.2.7-STABLE #0: Mon Aug 24 02:20:10 EDT 1998 
**http://www.freebsd.org/search.html "Alot of answers found here see
FAQ's"**
***** FreeBSD IT's HARD TO BELIEVE IT IS FREE ! http://www.FreeBSD.org
*****

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36477642.D3BF0786>