Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 11:01:36 +1000 (EST) From: Carl Makin <carl@xena.aipo.gov.au> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Support for large mfs Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004281058490.37264-100000@newton.aipo.gov.au> In-Reply-To: <200004271634.JAA05279@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Matthew, On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote: > I can't imagine why MFS would perform better... it shouldn't, every > block is stored in system memory *TWICE* (once in the VM cache, and > once in the mfs process's address space). If you have enough system I've been running a MFS /tmp dir since around 2.2.4, are you now saying that it would be better (under 4.0-STABLE or CURRENT) to run a swap backed vnode fs? Carl. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0004281058490.37264-100000>