Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 15:27:15 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Subject: Re: Process/thread states. Message-ID: <XFMail.20020903152715.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0209031144280.12482-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03-Sep-2002 Julian Elischer wrote: > We'd (david and I) like to go ahead and provide a general patch to > implement this, for others to peruse, but we'd like to > hear if there will be screaming first before we do more work on it.. Please be consistent. You have SLEEPING, so I would use SLEEP instead of SLP. Also, I would use CLEAR instead of CLR. Personally I don't want to have to use Caps Lock to write kernel code and I find the kernel shouting at me about thread states to be a bit much (I don't see why just using == to check a thread state is all that hard). Just please at least be consistent if you are going to uglify things. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20020903152715.jhb>