Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 20:26:11 +0200 From: Hanspeter Roth Bsag <roth@bsag.ch> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ext2fs support robust? Message-ID: <20000905202611.B7650@bs11.bsag.ch> In-Reply-To: <20000905102436.A3926@dan.emsphone.com>; from dnelson@emsphone.com on Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 10:24:36AM -0500 References: <20000903154433.A13312@bs11.bsag.ch> <20000903140003.D18862@fw.wintelcom.net> <20000904100032.A21607@bs11.bsag.ch> <20000904141605.B14338@dan.emsphone.com> <20000905152852.A4417@bs11.bsag.ch> <20000905102436.A3926@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 10:24:36AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > > The main thing is that it supports NFSv3, which makes for write speeds > as fast as regular filesystem writes. Without NFSv3, you have to sync > writes to disk before acknowledging them back to the client, which is > pretty slow. NFSv3 also handles files over 4gb, but that's not an > issue with Linux yet. This if I manage to make Linux 2.2.16 plus Higgen's Merges' Nfs3 patch work on Suse 6.4 I should have an Nfs with similar performance? -Hanspeter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000905202611.B7650>