Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:33:15 -0400
From:      Miles Nordin <carton@Ivy.NET>
To:        freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Netbooting Sparc64+HD question (Boot problems resolved without netboot)
Message-ID:  <oqy7kc1pl0.fsf@castrovalva.Ivy.NET>
In-Reply-To: <6d7d37410704280814i1eb053b6x281b714f9a4c3d09@mail.gmail.com> (Didrik Madheden's message of "Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:14:21 %2B0200")
References:  <6d7d37410704280814i1eb053b6x281b714f9a4c3d09@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Sat_Apr_28_11:32:33_2007-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

>>>>> "dm" == Didrik Madheden <didrik@kth.se> writes:

    dm> Maybe I'll try on netbooting sometime again when I feel more
    dm> confident.

yeah, I still don't know what was wrong.  I guess I would try tcpdump
next.

    >> atapci0: using PIO transfers above 137GB as workaround for
    >> 48bit DMA access bug expect reduced performance

this is a hardware bug on the Ultra 5/10 that's CMD/Silicon Image's
fault.  Sun never added a workaround to their driver---they just
refuse to ship the machines with >80GB.  I didn't know the SunBlade
100 had the bug, too.

In theory, it means exactly what it says.  In practice, I've found IDE
on Ultra 5/10 is so crappy and such a time-sink that I avoid it like
the plague.  On FreeBSD/NetBSD I use SCSI or netbooting, and on
Solaris I use SCSI, FireWire with Oxford 911 firewire cases only, and
the iSCSI initiator to IDE targets in i386 boxes.  Each of those has
its own problems.  (respectively: expense, expense and smartctl
doesn't work, and kernel panics when you unplug the network cable.)

In general I've had so many small problems with IDE on not-i386: I
have some PCI card that will work at Ultra100 speed in NetBSD/i386,
but in NetBSD/macppc it only works at Ultra33.  Some cards don't work
right unless the chip is initialized by their secret proprietary
PeeCee BIOS.  The problems never get fixed or explained.  I don't know
if there is something about the chips that assumes i386 or what.
Reliable storage on noti386 has been a major frustration for me, so I
guess you'll have to try it and see.  good luck. :/

--pgp-sign-Multipart_Sat_Apr_28_11:32:33_2007-1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)

iQCVAwUARjNpO4nCBbTaW/4dAQLgkwP/SxgbKYIIPiUoAaMQzBqKuuJ4hhCdUY7e
1L8JqLZ9gq5sDUCRyGRUOreLOSefH8wO8eygJcH7jvDuOhySWBXJYzgrhpocBMAP
B2jHT/pOE77VlVy5BbJDrCjIekYuFp5qYpY6ogP8b8sFZ00hHo19/Eo5pgsL9NTp
S8PaUhttYZk=
=MrCK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pgp-sign-Multipart_Sat_Apr_28_11:32:33_2007-1--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?oqy7kc1pl0.fsf>