Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2017 02:35:26 +0200 From: Sydney Meyer <meyer.sydney@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VirtualBox outbound networking Message-ID: <57DAD930-7160-4F8B-AA68-CFD34E5A50F5@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <201707090012.v690CSwI055681@mail.karels.net> References: <201707090012.v690CSwI055681@mail.karels.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, same here. Bridging is working as it should, including ICMP of = course. On Windows, i wouldn't even be able to manually add a route, so that one = is out for me too:) I found several posts about NAT-related problems with VirtualBox. I read = vb is using "slirp" for it's NAT implementation, because of portability, = which appears to do crazy things to ICMP messages, but, obviously, i = dont know this for sure. But it doesn't appear to be a problem with FreeBSD or the RC's itself, = so i will ask around some VirtualBox users or @freebsd-virtualization.. > On 9. Jul 2017, at 02:12, Mike Karels <mike@karels.net> wrote: >=20 >> Mea Cupla, i guess.. I can confirm that both, NAT and bridged = networking, are indeed working fine on 11.1-RC1 too. The "problem" = appears to be "only" with ICMP and the way VirtualBox implements NAT, = i.e. TCP and UDP work fine. A post from last month stated bridged = networking on 11.1 BETA1 onwards wouldn't work either, that i can = confirm is working fine, at least here and as far as i can see. >=20 >> Mike, can your vbox guests send ICMP messages beyond their gateway on = 10.3 or is this known behaviour? >=20 > Yes, I can ping beyond the default gateway. But I realized after I = set > the last response, I am using bridging and not NAT. Don't want to use > Windows routing :-)! >=20 > Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57DAD930-7160-4F8B-AA68-CFD34E5A50F5>