Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 9 Oct 2006 07:46:52 +0100
From:      "Greg Hennessy" <>
To:        <>
Subject:   RE: Need a little PF help here, please...
Message-ID:  <000301c6eb6e$b49aeda0$0201a8c0@vaio>
In-Reply-To: <000001c6eb31$bab05140$6401a8c0@iea4grrtmmd560>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> However, if
> I comment out the PF rule "block in all" then suddenly I can ping
> Why will my server not resolve names (like 
> if the
> "block in all" statement exists? Why does that statement mess it up?
> What am I missing? Please help because I am totally frustrated.
> block in all

The default block rule should always have logging enabled, no exceptions. 

It should be 

	block log all

The pf logs would have told you straight away what was being dropped and

On a side note, 

The default block rule should match both ingress and egress traffic. 
A system cannot be deemed secure it if implictly allows egress traffic to


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <$b49aeda0$0201a8c0>