Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 14:33:49 +0000 From: Kris Moore <kris@pcbsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports and PBIs Message-ID: <4BDEDECD.70508@pcbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <r2vf0dd9eb91004301729j38c2d38cp4313841ce7a0554@mail.gmail.com> References: <4BBFD502.1010507@elischer.org> <r2w6201873e1004092011y829fe434w724ccde9cbf78e2c@mail.gmail.com> <o2z11167f521004092328z50ed9c9zde0294a344439709@mail.gmail.com> <x2i7d6fde3d1004100020oc8be3c51ree5f1e4b07b99f45@mail.gmail.com> <4BC03ABA.6090309@elischer.org> <q2q7d6fde3d1004100335ucf424ae0gbfcdba950fd68767@mail.gmail.com> <4BC0CC6F.7010009@freebsd.org> <r2vf0dd9eb91004301729j38c2d38cp4313841ce7a0554@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/01/2010 00:29, James Butler wrote: > Genuine (possibly stupid) question -in PBI land, what happens if > package B is, say, CUPS? Does one need versioned rc.d scripts to start > one or the other? Which one gets to claim port 631? > > -James Butler > That is a problem we are dealing with right now. We have to check to ensure that we don't already have a rc.d script for CUPS, and default to the pre-existing one if so. The only other option I see is that we default to the PBI one, but either way we can only have one copy running at a time :) -- Kris Moore PC-BSD Software iXsystems
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BDEDECD.70508>