Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:12:48 +0200
From:      Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Chern Lee <chern@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributing articl
Message-ID:  <20020730151248.A26490@abigail.blackend.org>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20020729173812.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 05:38:12PM -0400
References:  <20020729141730.E29717-100000@www.freebsdmall.com> <XFMail.20020729173812.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 05:38:12PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
[...]
> > 
> > I don't think I've ever seen a context diff used in the recent doc world,
> > but since you're a man of the source I'll make this change.
> 
> Well, -u is definitely the most common, probably something like:
> 
>  "The preferred diff(1) format for submitting patches is the unified
>   output format generated by 'diff -u'.  However, for patches that
>   substantially  change a region of code a context output format diff
>   generated by 'diff -c' may be more readable and thus preferable."
> 

It seems to be a good solution. :)

Marc

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020730151248.A26490>