Date: 29 May 1998 13:15:54 +0200 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) To: Robert Nordier <rnordier@nordier.com> Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, eivind@yes.no, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Replacing gcc as the system compiler Message-ID: <xzp67ip8h05.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Robert Nordier's message of "Thu, 28 May 1998 20:35:07 %2B0200 (SAT)" References: <199805281835.UAA26210@ceia.nordier.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Nordier <rnordier@nordier.com> writes: > I'm not sure why you feel the correct prototype > > int execl(const char *, const char *, ...); > > has a significant effect in this case. The ellipsis doesn't mean I meant one thing and wrote the other. I think I'll just shut up until after I have read the draft proposal. -- Noone else has a .sig like this one. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp67ip8h05.fsf>