Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:07:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Jeffrey Hsu <hsu@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0108271705380.96218-100000@niwun.pair.com> In-Reply-To: <20010827042218.0648737B405@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Jeffrey Hsu wrote: > Rate-halving is implemented in the PSC version of SACK. Perhaps > we should take a look at that? Makes sense, if we want Rate-halving. All the papers evaluating it have sounded good, and it probably is good to incorporate. My only concern is whether it will be controversial to merge, which is why I think I'd like basic SACK + newreno first, then Rate-halving + FACK later. Of course, that does emply that taking the SACK bits from the PSC implementation might be best then. I'll look more into this. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.30.0108271705380.96218-100000>