Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:00:45 -0600 From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= <norgaard@locolomo.org> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: IMAP server alternatives Message-ID: <803863D7-3659-4017-87B6-5BD0929E7D99@shire.net> In-Reply-To: <44B3EF71.5060407@locolomo.org> References: <44B3A7AA.1050600@enternet.hu> <44B3D42F.5050201@voidcaptain.com> <44B3EF71.5060407@locolomo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 11, 2006, at 12:35 PM, Erik N=F8rgaard wrote: > It seems that dovecot wins the votes - but does it support virtual > domains? Any tips on migration? That all depends on how you store your user data. It is not dovecot =20= or courier issue. I have both courier and dovecot working in =20 parallel on the same mail store. The dovecot is currently just for =20 testing and the courier is in production (for the last 4 years or =20 more). We store the domain as part of the user name in a custom ldap =20= database and courier and dovecot have no issues interfacing with it =20 with the proper config. Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?803863D7-3659-4017-87B6-5BD0929E7D99>