Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 Jun 2002 13:30:37 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
Cc:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, phk@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: dump (via amanda) causing panics
Message-ID:  <20020607133037.A59446@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020607125955.A29575@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>; from brooks@one-eyed-alien.net on Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 12:59:55PM -0700
References:  <20020605222202.A17619@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <20020606155619.U10544-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <20020607125955.A29575@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 12:59:55PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:06:40PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > > This fixes the panic.  It appears there's also another bug in dump
> > > though.  When I run dump I get this:
...
> > >   DUMP: master/slave protocol botched.
> > >   DUMP: The ENTIRE dump is aborted.
...
> > I guess this is another 64-bit daddr_t problem.  At least
> > `daddr_t idblk[MAXNINDIR]' in traverse.c seems to be broken.  This seems
> > to be fixed in the ufs2 patch.
> 
> Applying phk's patch seems to have fixed it.  It's a bit overkill for
> fixing dump, but it did work and I guess this way I can do some limited
> testing of the ufs2 patch.

Can you reduce PHK's ufs2 patch down to the minium required to fix dump?
That could then be committed now.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020607133037.A59446>