Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 01:03:52 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Paul Richards <paul@freebsd-services.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops Message-ID: <27696.1054681432@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "02 Jun 2003 22:54:01 BST." <1054590840.1641.12.camel@cf.freebsd-services.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <1054590840.1641.12.camel@cf.freebsd-services.com>, Paul Richards wr ites: >On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:36, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> I thought the point in KOBJ was that it was extensible so you could >> KLD load stuff which added more methods ? > >Not exactly. It allows for dynamic binding of methods that implement a >specified interface. It gives you 2 things mainly: > >The possible methods available in an interface are fixed, they're >defined in the .m files. Then I don't see the justification for the hashing & caching when it can be resolved at compile time... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?27696.1054681432>