Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:38:42 -0701 From: Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Strange fstype in bsdlabel output Message-ID: <20030806173904.GA90456@lizzy.catnook.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
traitor:~% mount
/dev/da0s1a on / (ufs, local)
devfs on /dev (devfs, local)
/dev/da0s1f on /localhome (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/da0s1e on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/da0s1d on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/md0 on /tmp (ufs, local, nodev, nosuid, soft-updates)
procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
linprocfs on /usr/compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local)
fdescfs on /dev/fd (fdescfs)
traitor:~% dumpfs /dev/da0s1d | grep UFS
magic 11954 (UFS1) time Wed Aug 6 10:34:03 2003
traitor:~% dumpfs /dev/da0s1e | grep UFS
magic 11954 (UFS1) time Wed Aug 6 10:26:10 2003
traitor:~% dumpfs /dev/da0s1f | grep UFS
magic 11954 (UFS1) time Wed Aug 6 10:19:16 2003
traitor:~% bsdlabel da0s1
# /dev/da0s1:
8 partitions:
# size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg]
a: 262144 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 16392
b: 2097152 262144 unused 0 0
c: 35551782 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit
d: 1048576 2359296 unused 0 0
e: 12582912 3407872 unused 0 0
f: 19560998 15990784 unused 0 0
traitor:~%
Why are d,e,f designated as `unused'? Shouldn't they be `4.2BSD' instead?
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ Sunnyvale, CA
_/ _/ _/
_/ _/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/
jos at catnook.com _/_/ _/_/_/ require 'std/disclaimer'
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030806173904.GA90456>