Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:18:12 -0700
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, Tony <rigstars@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: All in one machine running w/ Dansguardian+Squid+IPFW
Message-ID:  <4C88FAB4.4060401@elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100909162334.N92609@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
References:  <AANLkTi=9r4OK0brNKFzGC42joqa1U%2B_PTaXQU8y%2BE-%2Bx@mail.gmail.com> <4C88188A.8010903@elischer.org> <AANLkTi=kwfRgR=HhCRkU0H69agqZOFQkWmLob-36JuT1@mail.gmail.com> <4C88530F.7030709@elischer.org> <20100909162334.N92609@sola.nimnet.asn.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/8/10 11:26 PM, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Julian Elischer wrote:
>   >  On 9/8/10 4:44 PM, Tony wrote:
>   >  >  my setup looks like this
>   >  >
>   >  >  PC1 ->   browser ->   firewall(redirects port 80 to 8888) ->   dansguardian(
>   >  >  127.0.0.1:8888) ->   squid(127.0.0.1:3333) ->   internet
>   >  >
>   >  >  keep in mind that everything you see above are all on the same PC1
>   >  >
>   >
>   >  you may need to use divert and natd to achieve the effect you require.
>
> Is this a case where in-kernel NAT wouldn't work as well?
>
> Or haven't apple incorporated that into their ipfw?

I have doubts as to whether either ipfw forward OR in-kernel nat are 
in their version of the stack.
(I have no proof but....)

>
> cheers, Ian




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C88FAB4.4060401>