Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 23:46:30 +0200 From: Cyrille Lefevre <cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net> To: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM> Cc: Thomas Seck <tmseck-lists@netcologne.de>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Package system flaws? Message-ID: <20020714214630.GA1455@gits.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <200207141624.g6EGOa0L033175@whizzo.transsys.com> References: <20020712121427.GD3678@lummux.tchpc.tcd.ie> <20020712144854.GA756@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <20020713054141.A26277@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <20020713011750.GA755@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <20020714042237.GD931@lizzy.catnook.com> <20020714042623.GB95460@squall.waterspout.com> <20020714095939.GA588@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <200207141333.g6EDXj0L031673@whizzo.transsys.com> <20020714155728.GA4237@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <200207141624.g6EGOa0L033175@whizzo.transsys.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 12:24:36PM -0400, Louis A. Mamakos wrote: [snip] > Why do you care what the implementation language of the tool is if it > solves the problem? Shouldn't we be pleased there even exists a tool the answer is simple, `portupgrade' is written in `ruby' and `ruby' isn't part of the base system, so, `portupgrade' can't be part in the base system 'til it is rewritten in another language available in the base system. PS : I don't use `portupgrade' but home made tools written in `ksh'. Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020714214630.GA1455>