Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 19:48:23 -0700 From: David Newman <woshibigstomach@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: md5 -t native vs VM Message-ID: <55D7E2F7.5040100@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <55D7DA8D.4060704@sneakertech.com> References: <55D7D5CE.5010205@sneakertech.com> <55D7DA8D.4060704@sneakertech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
These are two different userlands and versions of md5: - the FreeBSD 10.1 md5 manpage is dated 31 July 2012 - the OS X md5 manpage is dated 6 June 2004 Also, OS X's userland dates from Darwin and FreeBSD releases in the 4.x and 5.x days. Granted, it has changed a lot since then, but not in lockstep with FreeBSD. dn On 8/21/15 7:12 PM, Quartz wrote: >> I have an OSX machine. When I run FreeBSD inside VirtualBox, 'md5 -t' is >> about 5% faster than in the native OSX terminal. Same digest >> (766a2bb5d24bddae466c572bcabca3ee) and everything. >> >> Can anyone explain what's going on? > > Also related: 'md5 -t' runs slower (~88%) on a 2.4ghz core2duo than a > 2.5ghz dual core celeron of the same vintage. I'm assuming the extra > cache and such doesn't matter to md5? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55D7E2F7.5040100>