Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:02:26 +1000 From: Danny Carroll <fbsd@dannysplace.net> To: Koen Smits <kgysmits@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing. Message-ID: <496712A2.4020800@dannysplace.net> In-Reply-To: <b072dc420901090046v77bc5407xacda5e65fc6ad7bf@mail.gmail.com> References: <20081031033208.GA21220@icarus.home.lan> <491C5AA7.1030004@samsco.org> <491C9535.3030504@dannysplace.net> <CEDCDD3E-B908-44BF-9D00-7B73B3C15878@anduin.net> <4920E1DD.7000101@dannysplace.net> <F55CD13C-8117-4D34-9C35-618D28F9F2DE@spry.com> <20081117070818.GA22231@icarus.home.lan> <496549D9.7010003@dannysplace.net> <b072dc420901072348n7d094937u89b6d24959f8ae3d@mail.gmail.com> <4966B6B1.8020502@dannysplace.net> <b072dc420901090046v77bc5407xacda5e65fc6ad7bf@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Koen Smits wrote: > Those numbers are pretty good, right? Who needs onboard XOR anyway :) > Those numbers are great, but I would love to know that writes to the disks are also protected by the battery backup. If not then I'll be forced to use either hardware raid5/6 or perhaps some other configuration. Maybe 6 stripe sets in a raidz array? At the end of the day however I really don't care about the performance, even the slowest of the tests I did would be fast enough to saturate a gigabit ethernet port, which is way fast enough for me. But its an interesting set of tests... -D
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?496712A2.4020800>