Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:25:45 +0400 From: =?koi8-r?B?98HEyc0g8MXU0tHF1w==?= <vpetryaev@tdnika.ru> To: "'Jeremy Messenger'" <mezz.freebsd@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, mezz@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD Port: transmission-daemon-2.04_1 Message-ID: <000001cb740d$769c6930$63d53b90$@ru> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinyQEFofRKD549fdU7MiPLU7heTpfkpn%2BwcRxhk@mail.gmail.com> References: <000501cb70fe$e89a6df0$b9cf49d0$@ru> <AANLkTinyQEFofRKD549fdU7MiPLU7heTpfkpn%2BwcRxhk@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello! I'm fully understand, that every version of Transmission (as every = software) has bugs. But, different bugs annoying different users. For example: - 2.04 try to connect via IPv6 when IPv6 completely disabled, but 2.11 = not - Ticket #3329 (Connection problems when downloading) fixed - Small file cache reduce HDD load (20-30% in my configuration!) And result: Transmission 2.11 runs on my server 5 days without any = issues. May be better let user to choose not last release versions, but always = allow user to use last version? For example, if you want, it's possible to create two (stable and development) branches in ports tree. Best regards, Vadim. -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Messenger [mailto:mezz.freebsd@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 5:15 AM To: =F7=C1=C4=C9=CD =F0=C5=D4=D2=D1=C5=D7 Cc: mezz@freebsd.org; ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: transmission-daemon-2.04_1 2010/10/21 =F7=C1=C4=C9=CD =F0=C5=D4=D2=D1=C5=D7 <vpetryaev@tdnika.ru>: > Hello! > > > > Transmission was two times released after version 2.04 > https://trac.transmissionbt.com/roadmap?show=3Dcompleted > > 10 October released 2.10 and 17 October released 2.11 > > May be you need some help for port maintenance? > > As I understand, this port require only one patch changes - because patched > libtransmission/fdlimit.c changed. I am not commit the update yet. Transmission have a bad history of release version that isn't stable enough as you can see they already have 2.11 in a very short peroid. I am able to reproduce a few of problems in 2.10 and 2.11. The 2.12 might be released sometimes soon (just a guess), so I will see how it goes. Cheers, Mezz > Good luck, Vadim --=20 mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000001cb740d$769c6930$63d53b90$>