Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:53:07 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org, Robert Noland <rnoland@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Hal and KDM breakage (was Re: KDE4 and input events stalled) Message-ID: <92cd2ff70904071653r4bf3b381lf5de220b2e280c0c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1239147806.98664.12.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <934e1d760904061455o4736d643o1d07e3292192d94c@mail.gmail.com> <1239077210.1908.39.camel@balrog.2hip.net> <49DAD429.6090309@freebsd.org> <1239078081.1908.41.camel@balrog.2hip.net> <49DAE987.7090802@freebsd.org> <1239086408.35025.59.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20090407185915.GY31409@albert.catwhisker.org> <49DBA371.3080804@freebsd.org> <92cd2ff70904071637h362da63ua13c1f8eca6fc616@mail.gmail.com> <1239147806.98664.12.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org>wrote: > > It's not a question of what hal is doing, but rather how console-kit > works (and hald depends on console-kit-daemon). It needs to be able to > monitor each of the active vtys... This is the part of the picture I'm still missing. *Why* does hald (via console-kit) care about tracking active vtys? (I presume hald actually doesn't care but that some client of hald needs this information.... ???) .... Bland did some work to correct this in -CURRENT, but it > won't work on other versions. It was just easier to leave the hack in > place. > > If this could be universally fixed in all supported versions of FreeBSD, > then I would be happy to remove the hacks. I'm still curious whether it's feasible to just not monitor the vtys. Tim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?92cd2ff70904071653r4bf3b381lf5de220b2e280c0c>