Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:19:34 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 207253] cad/openvsp: Fix in 11-CURRENT Message-ID: <bug-207253-13-iPawpOO3DI@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-207253-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-207253-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D207253 --- Comment #9 from Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> --- I agree, but this is legacy software (version 3 doesn't even have its own a= rray implementation anymore as far as I can see) that won't be changed upstream. My question is if libc++ is right in declaring std::array when not in C++11 mode or if this clash shouldn't happen at all, even if what the program doe= s is dangerous. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-207253-13-iPawpOO3DI>