Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 May 2013 21:02:08 +0200
From:      Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>
To:        mdf@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-stable-8@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r250249 - in stable/8/sys: . amd64/amd64 dev/sound i386/i386 kern
Message-ID:  <AB58AB2A-0C47-4E0F-ADF8-221625764884@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMBSHm-kKtAyMterKLSTvA39JO7Xzn4Cvo8QgkAyadhu=uOH-A@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201305041849.r44In5HK095619@svn.freebsd.org> <CAMBSHm93hTk-fWmeeKyX-e%2B9o4r1CMEyRJVA9D%2BTXd%2B38T1gTA@mail.gmail.com> <9AFDCE3E-8967-428A-89C2-4C9F9888E040@FreeBSD.org> <201305060959.52379.jhb@freebsd.org> <CAMBSHm-kKtAyMterKLSTvA39JO7Xzn4Cvo8QgkAyadhu=uOH-A@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 6, 2013, at 20:27, mdf@FreeBSD.org wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 6:59 AM, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:
...
> Also, because of 1.7 merges adding more subdir mergeinfo, 1.6 merges =
now add
> a lot more mergeinfo.  1.6 should really be avoided at this point for =
merges
> if at all possible.
>=20
> Should I back this out, then, and re-do?  And why did this happen on =
stable/8, but not stable/9 for the same MFC?

No, the spurious mergeinfo is not harmful, just a bit ugly.  It should =
be removed manually, by an svn expert (with a tiny bit of OCD... ;-).

I think the stable/8 tree just contains more of this spurious merge =
info, simply because a lot of that tree was created when svn 1.6 was the =
current version.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AB58AB2A-0C47-4E0F-ADF8-221625764884>