Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:10:33 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Nathan Butcher <n-butcher@fusiongol.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Encrypted zfs? Message-ID: <86ir6y3b3a.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <46D4EFFF.5080807@fusiongol.com> (Nathan Butcher's message of "Wed\, 29 Aug 2007 13\:03\:11 %2B0900") References: <46D4EFFF.5080807@fusiongol.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nathan Butcher <n-butcher@fusiongol.com> writes: > The only thing that sucks is that once I have attached all GELI > providers, I have to manually kickstart zfs and mount the pool with the > following commands:- That shouldn't be necessary; geli starts before zfs in the rc order. > One thing I also tried was replacing a drive with a much larger one > using zpool replace. ZFS didn't notice the larger disk capacity of the > new drive and subsequently didn't increase the pool size. What is the > logic behind that? How do you expect ZFS to provide redundancy for the larger disk? Your pool will grow when all disks are replaced with larger ones. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ir6y3b3a.fsf>