Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:29:29 +0800 From: dave jones <s.dave.jones@gmail.com> To: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions about setting bridge Message-ID: <AANLkTinZogC-3NaU59oh2RBQXdA7gp7MM0efz%2BqSDtjP@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=k5DZVE36==m3HJxnnY4hZDrN3OxMsnacrSzcm@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTikYUng4L98dEDniibOYxwPN3FPFK1YVwXq3u7Bb@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=k5DZVE36==m3HJxnnY4hZDrN3OxMsnacrSzcm@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: >> I want to setup a bridge in a ring topology since a break at any point >> along the ring would >> still leave all stations connected. My machine has two nics. In >> /etc/rc.conf, I have: >> >> ifconfig_em0=3D"inet 192.168.1.0 =A0netmask 255.255.255.0" >> cloned_interfaces=3D"bridge0" >> ifconfig_em0=3D"up" >> ifconfig_em1=3D"up" >> ifconfig_bridge0=3D"addm em0 addm em1 up" >> ifconfig_bridge0_alias0=3D"192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 up" >> >> I tried to boot my clients using tftpd, but it seems doesn't work if I >> unpluged >> em0. If I run "ifconfig em1 inet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0" then >> my clients can boot via tftpd. But it's not a bridge, right? >> I mean should I configure the same ip for em0, em1, and bridge0? > > 192.168.1.0/24 is not a valid address.=A0 Your addressable hosts are > 192.168.1.1 - 192.168.1.254. Oops, typo. Should be 192.168.1.1 > > I think you want to lagg: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-aggregation.html In Winodws, I setup a bridge with no problems. But in FreeBSD, it seems doesn't work :( > > -- > Adam Vande More >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinZogC-3NaU59oh2RBQXdA7gp7MM0efz%2BqSDtjP>