Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 22:58:46 +0000 From: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" <stephen@missouri.edu> To: Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@riseup.net>, "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: Is there an equivalent of NO_EXTRACT? Message-ID: <C5AB974596860E46907FAE81753E266E01314C5945@UM-MBX-N02.um.umsystem.edu> In-Reply-To: <55EF56C9.4000800@riseup.net> References: <55EF56C9.4000800@riseup.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think EXTRACT_ONLY will do the equivalent of what you need.=0A= =0A= ________________________________________=0A= From: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org] on = behalf of Piotr Kubaj [pkubaj@riseup.net]=0A= Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 4:44 PM=0A= To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org=0A= Subject: Is there an equivalent of NO_EXTRACT?=0A= =0A= I'm a maintainer of a few ports. For the next update I'm preparing, I=0A= want to make it possible to download some addons via options. The thing=0A= is, they are downloaded as-is. They are not meant to be extracted=0A= (although they are zips), since it's the program itself that manages it.=0A= Is there such a possibility?=0A= =0A=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C5AB974596860E46907FAE81753E266E01314C5945>